tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20706227.post8168814190521336546..comments2023-10-02T05:43:43.661-04:00Comments on Ta Shmah: On the CJLS decisionNatanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17055326586934271425noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20706227.post-16317769029125724602007-01-12T12:41:00.000-05:002007-01-12T12:41:00.000-05:00I have read them all and I did not mean to imply t...I have read them all and I did not mean to imply that the Dorff/Reisner for they say "The explicit biblical ban on anal sex between men remains in effect. Gay men are instructed to refrain from anal sex." on Page 19 of their Tshuva. <br /><br />What I was referring to when I wrote: <br /><i>It bothers me, that the students at JTS believe that driving on Shabbat is assur yet Homosexual marriage and ordination (let alone the Homosexual act) should be permitted by Halacha.</i><br />is that it bothers me that there are JTS students that believe (along with some of the CJLS) that anal sex (or the Homosexual act) should be allowed because of compassion.Natanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17055326586934271425noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20706227.post-85667410652220686612007-01-12T10:42:00.000-05:002007-01-12T10:42:00.000-05:00umm have you actually read the nevins/dorff/reisne...umm have you actually read the nevins/dorff/reisner teshuva?<br /><br />that one is obviously the more liberal of the two and while I haven't finished reading it, it does not seem to be permitting anal sex, or what you delicately call "the homosexual act"Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com